The content on this page and other DBCDE document archive pages is provided to assist research and may contain references to activities or policies that have no current application. See the full archive disclaimer.
Alan in Sydney
With the greatest possible respect, this is evasive nonsense. What is the name of this technology? Where is it in use? Are you talking about DPI? If you're speaking about some other technology, we'd like to consult about that as well. The more specific you can get, the more useful this exercise will be. If you are seriously proposing to add DPI to the filter how are you going to guarantee the privacy of online users? It would be good if you can confirm that you're considering DPI, because it will allow us to show what a catastrophe that would be. Until now I'd simply assumed this was a fairly crass level of incompetence driven by an understandable and sincerely held opposition to the exploitation of children. I discounted comments in these threads about privacy and free speech for that reason, DPI would make the issue of a threat to free expression and privacy not only serious but extremely grave. PS Can we have paragraphs please?
