The content on this page and other DBCDE document archive pages is provided to assist research and may contain references to activities or policies that have no current application. See the full archive disclaimer.

 

Buddyij

Hi there.. This is a strange approach and yet the government decides to not to listen to the people..reminds me of the howard government and if this goes ahead i can see the next election to go the otherway and the alp will not be in power. net filtering odd concept, lofty goal and totally unreachable and attainable. the government is wanting to build a whole new broadband network yet wants to slow it down by over 85%. so why build it then. let the economy suffer and tank, allow jobs to dissappear and peoples information to hacked and taken. a better option is to make it optional for those who want it. the best option would be to encourage a netforce and then assistant funding it and actually placing the people in jail who do the wrong for this cp they claim. but the new system they want will only lead to a dictatorship with unhealth consequences, for example the science group who believes that christians who beleive creation loby the government to ban all pro-creation sites as they are harming the freedom of mans thought andare "hate sites" and walla done and not to mention that the temptation to accidently decide to blacklist national or liberals sites will be too great.. yet their theory is only theroy and not fact. the government wants to help the economy and yet at the same time wishes to stab it in the heart and destroy it. also the other countries that have done this does not work. china is always used as an example yet they are the largest counterfitters of media material in the world... so best to catch the criminals instead of hoping they go away... catch the cp criminals and people hacking and you will definately see an improvement and also train parents with knowledge of the net and how to track.

 
Document ID: 92878 | Last modified: 11 December 2008, 6:14am