The content on this page and other DBCDE document archive pages is provided to assist research and may contain references to activities or policies that have no current application. See the full archive disclaimer.
buddyj
hi, as to note about our economy.. well you state that mandetory filtering is designed to stop child porn.. odd tho cause in my 20 years of net use i have never came accross child porn... the statement that it is getting worse, is again incorrrect. have you taken note that even the police are against the idea.. why? very simply, it will drive them underground and make it practically impossible to catch the creators of child porn content. the current system works great as the criminals will be caught. the current proposal, will make it a safe haven for the criminals and nearly impossible to catch the criminals. the filters will overblock 1~8% of legal normal sites..doesnt sound bad right, well that equates to between 20mill~160mill legitamte sites. my company does the most business over the net adn oops sorry your sights been hit. this will hit our hip pocket and destroy many livelyhoods. the idea that problems will fixed along the way is incorrect, this will take 10~20years before this even becoms viable, but again everytime u try to ban "unwanted sites" people will allways find away around. this will not help our digital future, it will harm and kill it, blocking 160mill legal sites...ooops.. instead form a netforce, and tackle the problem.. higher the experts and train the police to catch the criminals..
Topic: Minister Tanner's welcome
