The content on this page and other DBCDE document archive pages is provided to assist research and may contain references to activities or policies that have no current application. See the full archive disclaimer.
Surprised
A very interesting blog I must say, and I agree with other bnlogers in that I do hope this is actually read and considered rather than beinag PR gimmick with no true chance for consideration, if so, this my friends is not not demcocracy, and if so would the present mionstr in charge of this project please condier better using his skills in lpace like China. With that context I pros either follwing qwuestions: 1) If this is just for child exploitation isues, then I concur, a great wothy envevour, however I ask wh this is not explciiny stated? My concern is plictical content will be sesnored, which again serves and policatial party whose is in powers self interest and does not serve the people who elcted them best interstes, in which case.. wrong country again.. back to china.. 2) With the current situation in world funding crisis how can we afford to waste precious resources on the maathod task and resources required to sesnotr the net when in time like this we should encourage and open the pathways for open dialogue everywhere to ride out the storm. The government should be investing time and energy into system to help everyday people be smart with their money. 3) This is reactive rather than proactive. Givernments should focus on sensorship aof mainstream meadia when they portray young girls in the wrong ways.. this is more effective and stops the intiators of the issue. 4) Wouldn’t a better investment be offering a free net blocking software so families can be proactive in this? 5) Why not invest resources in educated people of the value of children .
Topic: Minister Tanner's welcome
