The content on this page and other DBCDE document archive pages is provided to assist research and may contain references to activities or policies that have no current application. See the full archive disclaimer.

 

Akakjack

I was reading Sen.Conroy's comment that the 'Government does not view this debate as an argument about freedom of speech.' Well he needs to curb his arrogance, whether he views it in such a way or not isn't worth a used train ticket at the ballot box if the general population views it as an imposition on their freedom of speech. Also in a bigger picture framework, what type of country disarms their population and curbs freedom of speech, Russia, China and now Australia. Seems more than one political party has an agenda. This is why all measures that restrict freedoms should be looked at in a negative biased 'What If' manner. These issues say that innocent till proven guilty apply on an individual basis but not to the general populace as a whole.

 
Document ID: 94846 | Last modified: 23 December 2008, 1:42pm